Skip to content

Review of Wastewater Dilution Modeling

courtesy of NASA
On This Website

    Preface

    This report presents the findings and recommendations of an independent technical review of hydrodynamic modeling using the Finite Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM) to simulate wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent dilution in Buzzards Bay and the North and South Rivers, Massachusetts. The review was commissioned by WHOI Sea Grant, an independent, science-based program based at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and supported by funding from NOAA Award NA24OARX417C0156. Its intent is not to critique the quality of the modeling work conducted by University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth researchers and the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF), nor to question the regulatory decisions made by state agencies. Rather, it is meant to provide constructive scientific guidance on how to further strengthen confidence in the model results as they are considered for regulatory applications.

    WHOI Sea Grant recognizes the substantial effort undertaken by the U. Mass research team and MA DMF to apply a high-resolution, data-intensive modeling approach under limited time and resource constraints. Given the importance of shellfish classification decisions to both public health and coastal economies, ensuring that the modeling tools used in this process are robust, transparent, and well-supported by data is essential. It is our hope that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will provide additional resources to MA DMF to support the implementation of key recommendations made by the review team, including expanded model validation, improved uncertainty quantification, and engagement with interested parties. This review represents a step toward engaging modelers, regulators, and interested parties in a dialog that supports informed, science-based decision making.

    Executive Summary

    Coastal shellfish harvesting in Massachusetts is regulated to ensure public health, with water quality classifications guided by the National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP). A key factor in these classifications is the dilution of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent, which can impact nearby shellfish beds.  In response to FDA requests to clarify how dilution zones around WWTPs are calculated, the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF) partnered with U. Mass-Dartmouth researcher Dr. Changsheng Chen’s lab to use the Finite Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM) to estimate dilution zones around WWTP outfalls.  The modeling evaluations have been completed for WWTPs in Scituate (discharging to the North and South Rivers), Ipswich (discharging to Greenwood Creek, which flows into the Ipswich River), Fairhaven (discharging to New Bedford Harbor), and New Bedford (discharging to the open waters of Buzzards Bay). These model results have informed recent reclassifications of shellfish growing areas, resulting in large-scale downgrading of shellfish harvest classification and prompting the desire for an independent scientific review to evaluate the model’s application and reliability in regulatory decision making.

    To address this need, WHOI Sea Grant coordinated an independent technical review of two FVCOM modeling reports that were available as of December 2024, focused on the Fairhaven and New Bedford WWTPs and the Scituate WWTP, as well as associated validation materials provided by Dr. Chen’s team. Three experts in ocean modeling and coastal processes were asked to evaluate the model’s approach, performance, and suitability for informing shellfish water quality classifications and management of wastewater and combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharges. The experts were selected from outside Massachusetts and had no conflicts of interest with Dr. Chen or his research team. After the independent reviews were completed, MA DMF and Dr. Chen and his team were provided the opportunity to submit written responses. Their comments were aligned with the findings and recommendations of the review, and no changes to the report were necessary. The reviewers agreed the existing modeling framework as well as the high-resolution models are appropriate for use in assessments of wastewater treatment plant effluent dilution. They also included several recommendations and requests for additional information. Their findings can be summarized as follows:

    • Enhance model validation in the areas of interest
    • Improve clarity and documentation of modeling methods
    • Better address spatial and temporal uncertainty
    • Consider decay and non-passive behavior of contaminants

    Based on the reviewer feedback, WHOI Sea Grant recommends several actions to strengthen confidence in the application of the FVCOM model for this regulatory purpose. These include expanding validation of hydrodynamics using local observational data, testing the passive tracer model through dye studies or comparisons with past field efforts, improving documentation of modeling methods, assessing uncertainty through multi-year simulations, and evaluating the potential influence of contaminant decreases via natural processes. WHOI Sea Grant also recommends establishing an advisory board of scientists, managers, and shellfish industry representatives to provide ongoing guidance and promote transparency in the use of model results.

    Download the full report below.

    Technical Review Responses

    WHOI Sea Grant identified three indepedent reviewers to evaluate two FVCOM modeling reports, focused on the Fairhaven and New Bedford WWTPs and the Scituate WWTP, as well as additional validation materials provided by Dr. Chen’s team. Dr. Chen's team and MA DMF were offered an opportunity to respond to the three independent technical peer reviews. Dr. Chen's and DMF's responses to select comments from the technical reviews can be found below.

    Public Comments Sought

    Guidelines for providing feedback on the draft report and related material

    We invite you to provide feedback on the draft “Independent Technical Review of FVCOM Modeling for Wastewater Dilution in Buzzards Bay and the North and South Rivers: Considerations for Regulatory Implementation” or peer review responses. Feedback that aligns with the guidelines below will be published to this website and available publicly. Feedback will also be incorporated into a final version of this report. To ensure feedback is productive and respectful for everyone, please follow the guidelines:

    What We’re Looking For

    • Constructive input: Share thoughtful suggestions that can help improve practices, policies, or communication related to this topic.
    • Clarity and specificity: Include clear examples or experiences to help us understand your perspective.
    • Balanced comments: We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism.
    • Respectful tone: Please communicate in a way that is professional and courteous, even when offering criticism.
    • Your role in the industry: Let us know how you're involved (e.g., oyster farmer,recreational or commercial shellfish harvester, distributor/wholesaler, resource manager, concerned citizen, etc.) so we can better understand the context of your feedback.

    What to Avoid

    • Anonymous feedback: All feedback must include your name. Anonymous comments will not be considered.
    • Disrespectful or inappropriate language: Comments that include personal attacks, rude comments, or unprofessional language will not be published.

    Our Shared Goal

    This industry thrives on collaboration, transparency, and mutual respect. Your feedback helps us strengthen those values and improve outcomes for everyone involved. Thank you for contributing in a positive and constructive way.

    Email your comments to wwtp@whoi.edu by June 27.